Jackie Warner Calls Out Jillian Michaels as Horrible Person Amid Controversy

In a dramatic turn of events, former partner Jackie Warner has publicly condemned fitness guru Jillian Michaels, labeling her a “horrible person” during a recent podcast appearance. The allegations come on the heels of renewed scrutiny directed at Michaels following the Netflix program “Fit for TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser,” which features past contestants from the reality show making claims about the extreme and dangerous weight loss practices they endured, often attributing the pressure to Michaels herself.

Warner, who dated Michaels for seven years, aired her grievances on the August 22 episode of the “Hot Take & Deep Dives” podcast. With an air of frustration, she recounted a shocking incident that underscored her negative view of Michaels. “Jill was ready to punch, ready to spit, ready to curse in a beautiful restaurant surrounded by dressy, classy people,” Warner recalled, highlighting a particularly embarrassing moment when their behavior led staff to ask them to leave.

Continuing her critique, Warner referred to Michaels as the “Tasmanian Devil,” illustrating her ex-girlfriend’s volatile temperament. She described scenes where Michaels would become so unhinged that it led to public altercations, contributing to Warner’s ultimate decision to end their relationship. “Her behavior was so ‘embarrassing’ that I ultimately fell out of love with her completely,” Warner disclosed, underscoring the intensity of their tumultuous relationship.

This criticism coincides with Michaels’ efforts to defend her methods after contestants accused her of imposing severely restrictive diets during their time on “The Biggest Loser.” Responding to these allegations, which include claims about her ignoring medical advice from the show’s doctor, Michaels took to social media to assert her commitment to the health of the contestants. “I have an example of a direct written correspondence with a contestant, while she was home for the holidays during filming,” she stated on Instagram, asserting that she advised this contestant to consume 1,600 calories per day. Michaels also shared screenshots to bolster her claims of prioritizing adequate nutrition during filming.

However, the scrutiny doesn’t end there. Earlier this month, former co-star Bob Harper weighed in on the situation after revealing that Michaels had not reached out to him following his heart attack in 2017. “We weren’t besties, but we were partners on a television show for a very long time,” he expressed in an interview with The Guardian, suggesting that Michaels’ silence spoke volumes about their relationship. Harper, who has worked with Michaels since the show’s inception in 2004 until its conclusion in 2020, added that he wouldn’t expect her to act differently than her inclination.

In response to Harper’s comments, Michaels expressed her disappointment, indicating that she was taken aback by his public remarks. “I’m not here to get into catty, b–chy, nasty name-calling,” she stated during an interview on the “Hot Mics with Billy Bush” podcast. “I actually do hope that Bob is happy and well,” she added, attempting to defuse the situation while maintaining her stance amidst a storm of criticism.

The fallout from these revelations raises questions about Michaels’ future in an industry already rife with scrutiny over health and fitness standards. As celebrity culture continues to evolve, the public’s shifting sentiments surrounding body positivity and the ethics of weight loss practices only add to the complexity of this discourse. Many fans are now left pondering: Will Michaels’ reputation recover from this barrage of allegations, or will it alter the trajectory of her career moving forward?

The backlash against Michaels echoes a broader conversation in Hollywood about accountability, particularly for figures who have wielded substantial influence over public perceptions of health and wellness. The revelations from former contestants and partners, coupled with social media reactions, underscore a growing demand for transparency and responsibility in the realm of fitness and reality television.

As this saga unfolds, viewers and fans will undoubtedly continue to monitor the situation closely. The question remains open: Could this controversy influence Michaels’ prospects during the upcoming awards season or even shift the landscape of celebrity fitness training as a whole? As conversations around celebrity culture and accountability gain momentum, it will be intriguing to watch how these narratives develop and what choices Michaels will make in response to the mounting pressure.